X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:43:04 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <991010419.20100824094304@mtu-net.ru> To: Gregg Levine , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Building a custom cygwin1.dll library In-Reply-To: References: <20100822063050 DOT GA29569 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C72C3EB DOT 7080106 AT veritech DOT com> <20100824013716 DOT GA4807 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, Gregg Levine! > At the moment I am only asking. I've downloaded the snaps from the > past two days, haven't used them, and simply asked these questions. > Chris, I only asked, I don't want to add, or subtract any features. Yet again, why do you want to (re)build cygwin1.dll in first place? Out of pure curiosity? The complication level of this task seems irrational to me. > As for newlib..... That's the part I am thinking about. It's the way > the whole business might or might not interact with the idiotic way > Microsoft does things. Not related. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 24.08.2010, <9:41> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple