X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:11:03 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug tracker References: <20100818182641 DOT GB22698 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C6C4372 DOT 2070701 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818205009 DOT GK11340 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C6D17E0 DOT 5010506 AT blunn DOT org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi AT 4ax DOT com> <20100819141948 DOT GB19001 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100819144931 DOT GD19001 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C6D559B DOT 4030108 AT bopp DOT net> <20100819173439 DOT GC9090 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C6D8D33 DOT 5070902 AT bopp DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4C6D8D33.5070902@bopp.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0E73BB2A7C4BF528F3B5CBE8" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------enig0E73BB2A7C4BF528F3B5CBE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: > Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the > effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and > organized. Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at > this time. Bingo. That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare time. Why add overhead to a process that already works for me? --=20 Eric Blake eblake AT redhat DOT com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig0E73BB2A7C4BF528F3B5CBE8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMbY/XAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq04sIALB9xMLJdYxo5N5My8ROnzDu oM4zqmdprJZ++0hYlonH7OdIrVHDpFizySBji2MsRCUu+nIXTZrucWZW0QEl5dg6 queUMwUtLIzcRg133RTm73s0yjCmvSkul3xb+XPT/ie5y0pLuzeqcmlF3K4+2QNY jULvZYhtDeALMM9mpH5amqLhYqXMA54zJPxWSR1Cr5buKDFKW5skcO4C1X6hZVJd J/jcGAiV3HKgx6jntYHbV46bC9lo/w/UNNzNQu/Rvr7tJ/jeKPg4huogcYq1KRGu 7hec+0p6/6eftu2ZVx/mQc73ZLr73yWX9HLZmIVs6I+F7C5TiZLPYvyvqDehrP8= =9svV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0E73BB2A7C4BF528F3B5CBE8--