X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: Bug tracker Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:26:03 -0400 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4C6C1B01 DOT 4020808 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818182641 DOT GB22698 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C6C4372 DOT 2070701 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818205009 DOT GK11340 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C6D17E0 DOT 5010506 AT blunn DOT org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi AT 4ax DOT com> <20100819170553 DOT GB20290 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > On Aug 19 11:23, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > What is the status of http://cygwin.com/bugzilla? It appears to have been > > in use at least last year. > > > > Provisional effort? Occasionally used? Useful, not useful? > > Not used for Cygwin, right now. CGF was using it at least a little bit last year: http://cygwin.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10928 . But it doesn't seem to be used much. That installation appears to be for everything in sourceware.org, with a few Cygwin categories. It's too hard to use for Cygwin in that form, IMO. I guess I need to talk to the sourceware admins about whether a separate instance could be provided for Cygwin. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple