X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C6C4372.2070701@blunn.org> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:32:50 +0100 From: William Blunn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies References: <4C6C1B01 DOT 4020808 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818182641 DOT GB22698 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20100818182641.GB22698@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >> My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more relevant set of people. >> > Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package. > Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre. Rather than attempting to solve the problem head-on, redefine the problem domain so that the problem is already solved. Inspired. Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple