X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4C6B16A2 DOT 6000509 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrading to cygwin 1.7.6 vs gcc 4.5 From: Andy Koppe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 18 August 2010 06:25, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 18 August 2010 00:09, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 08/17/2010 04:54 PM, Ross Smith wrote: >>> I've installed the experimental gcc 4.5 packages (because that's the >>> version I'm using in all my other development environments, and it's >>> nice not to have to target multiple compiler versions any more), but now >>> that cygwin dll 1.7.6 is out, I can't seem to find a way to upgrade >>> cygwin without also downgrading gcc. In the installer, if I select >>> Current I get the new cygwin but the old gcc, while if I select >>> Experimental, it keeps the new gcc but doesn't offer me the new cygwin. >>> >>> At the moment I'm sticking with the old cygwin, because the gcc upgrade >>> is more important to me than the cygwin upgrade. Is there some way I'm >>> missing to select both, or do I just have to accept that I can't upgrade >>> anything else until the official gcc 4.5 is ready? >> >> Stay on the 'Curr' (not 'Exp'), click 'View' until you are on the >> Pending page, then cycle on the string next to each gcc package until it >> says Keep instead of the downgraded version number. > > I'd recommend selecting the 'Exp' button actually. That ensures that > all dependencies of gcc, e.g. libgcc and libffi, are upgraded to 4.5 > too. (It's yet another flaw of setup.exe that it doesn't automatically > upgrade dependencies of experimental versions accordingly.) Scratch that. I hadn't realised that if you select 'Exp', non-experimental packages no longer get updated, which of course is exactly what the OP was saying. This is awful. Andy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple