X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Gary Subject: Re: CygWin Security & Performance Issues Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:00:39 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <83hbiyfa0o.fsf@garydjones.name> References: <201008121351 DOT o7CDp56h018152 AT post DOT webmailer DOT de> <20100812140244 DOT GH14202 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <7359-1281637768-267998 AT sneakemail DOT com> <20100812191551 DOT GD26062 AT trikaliotis DOT net> <4C6456E8 DOT 4080808 AT apconsult DOT de> <20100812205059 DOT GA15724 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (cygwin) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:17:44PM +0200, DaveLaw wrote: >>Maybe the co-leader of the project should channel her efforts into just >>that, rather than getting peoples backs up with unnecessary nitpicking >>about how she thinks they should structure their emails. > > Welcome to the cygwin mailing list deny list. > > Any other takers? "Takers" as in "take him out the back and shoot him"? I'd say that's a *bit* mean, even for you... -- Gary Non-kook (allegedly) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple