X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:57:58 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: CygWin Security ; Performance Issues Message-ID: <20100812185758.GD15142@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <201008121351 DOT o7CDp56h018152 AT post DOT webmailer DOT de> <20100812140244 DOT GH14202 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <7359-1281637768-267998 AT sneakemail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7359-1281637768-267998@sneakemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:29:27PM -0400, Robert Jacobson wrote: >On 8/12/2010 10:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>Ok, I'll not waste my time and reply to you another time. That makes >>both of us happy. > >Is this what passes for professional behavior at Red Hat? This is off-topic. If you want to pursue the issue of "professional behavior" further then please use the cygwin-talk mailing list. That's what it is for. I'll be posting my reply there. Please do not reply further in this vein in the cygwin list. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple