X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk Message-ID: <4C61C206.7080007@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:17:58 -0400 From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Update on status of make-3.82 release for cygwin References: <4C61B2F5 DOT 2040409 AT qualcomm DOT com> <20100810202148 DOT GA27734 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C61BEEF DOT 1020301 AT qualcomm DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4C61BEEF.1020301@qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/10/2010 5:04 PM, Rob Walker wrote: > On 8/10/2010 1:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:13:41PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote: >>> On Cygwin, make-3.82 supports DOS paths by default. I'm curious about >>> what work might be involved in re-enabling the --ms-dos option, and I'd >>> like to help, if I can. >>> >>> I built my Cygwin make-3.82 packages directly from the upstream release >>> tarball using the attached script. >> I don't need help. I've been building make for years so I obviously >> don't need your script. >> > > Sorry for the confusion: I was not offering my script as "hey look, > here's how you do it", I was more saying "I did it this way, but maybe > that's too simple. What else is involved, and can I help with that?" > > So: I'm still curious about the work you anticipate might be required. > There's not much on the Cygwin site detailing the responsibilities of a > package maintainer beyond: It's a maintainer's responsibility to decide what's the best way to package the software for Cygwin. Obviously, there are basic guidelines, such as package naming, build scripts, and the like. But the rest is up to the maintainer. So if a maintainer doesn't think a feature fits well with Cygwin usage, then he/she is free to modify the package to disable that feature. Ditto if the feature is normally disabled but would be better enabled for Cygwin. This is the process that Chris is going through right now for make-3.82. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple