X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,TW_MK,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C5DC614.7040105@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:46:12 -0700 From: Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mkpasswd (434): [31] A device attached to the system is not functioning. References: <4C527BD1 DOT 50707 AT tlinx DOT org> <4C52D4A4 DOT 1030002 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C575282 DOT 6090805 AT tlinx DOT org> <4C563F26 DOT 8050706 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4C563F26.8050706@cygwin.com> X-Stationery: 0.4.10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > It's possible, sure. I expect it's pretty obvious where you might want to > make such a change in mkpasswd.c if you're so inclined. --- Inclined is FAR from the issue. I've tried to build cygwin at least 3 times and never been able to get it to make. It's a non-starter. There are no build instructions laying out what is needed to build it. There seems to be some presumption about what I have in my environment, that just isn't so. I mentioned it each time, but received no response -- as though I'm just expected to know -- which is the same problem -- assumption of some environment that I don't have. > >> Or are there other programs in windows that would try to print out the same >> information? >> >> I.e. say some variant of the "net" or "netsh" commands"? On linux, I can try >> debugging with the 'net' command and it's various outputs, but I don't know >> what I'd use here to do the same. > > I'm sure. The APIs in use aren't only for Cygwin. I don't know of any > utility that you can use, off the top of my head, that would provide better > insight than debugging through the code. ---- I tried a trace (and printed in my last report) of mkpasswd -- but couldn't even see what syscall it was that was failing! All I got was one of your fellow developer-children that went into some rant about things in my environment that made absolutely no difference to the issue at hand. Purely a waste of time trying to follow his insulting rant advice. > >> I've tried building things from cygwin before and never had any luck just >> satisfying the dependencies, so that's been a non-starter for me. > > Perhaps it's time to try again. In this case anyway, you wouldn't need > to build more than 'mkpasswd'. Shouldn't be too hard if you're used to > building any software. Sounds like you've done some of this before but > I may be misinterpreting. ==== I build software on linux all the time. I check things out from source as well as from tar modules. I rarely have problems building when the prerequisites are spelled out...like must have 'foobar- headers (or devel package), or must have 'snorpsnip' util installed... That wasn't the case when I tried building anything cygwin. When I asked about any documentation on such prerequisites, I believe I was told I could submit the documentation I needed myself (or some such verbage) -- which I took too mean "go Fiddle yourself". :-/ I'm willing to try again if anything has improved. But there were also issues about me signing off contracts to Redhat or something -- not something normal to most open source projects...and that was a bit of a put off as well. Has anything changed? For that matter, does cygwin build on linux, or is that more of a pain? Since I assume it's a large project, my large build machine is linux, though I've gotten a fairly good Windows machine since last time I tried building. I hope the make is amenable to "make -j"? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple