X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100806141140.GC31783@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20100806134005 DOT GD22459 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100806141140 DOT GC31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:51:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The dirent struct From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 6 August 2010 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug =A06 09:40, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:33:41AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >I assume d_fileno and d_reclen may be part of __d_unused1 or >> >__d_internal1? =A0I'd appreciate some help here, since I'm not sure what >> >to do at this point. >> >> No, they are not part of either of those fields. =A0If they were >> they would be exposed. >> >> They simply are not implemented. > > And they don't have to. =A0Per POSIX, only d_ino and d_name can be > expected by a portable application(*). Fair enough, thankfully they are don't seem to be used by the code, so I added an '#ifndef __CYGWIN__' around them and have managed to get by this. Thank you, Chris --=20 Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple