X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:59:07 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cohabitation of gold and gnu ld? Message-ID: <20100804145907.GA27635@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4C597EFB DOT 1050103 AT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C597EFB.1050103@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:53:47PM +0200, Gennaro Prota wrote: >Hi, > >I'm going to build gcc 4.5.1 to experiment with its C++0x >support and, since its an experimentation, I thought to have a >try at the gold linker too, if possible. > >The Cygwin installation I'm going to use already has its gcc >4.3.4, which I'd like to keep, and that one uses gnu ld. > >Would it be a problem to configure the new compiler with > > --enable-gold > >and make it use gold, leaving gnu ld for gcc 4.3.4? No. Gold doesn't produce windows executables. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple