X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <191029.22760.qm@web25503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:10:28 +0000 (GMT)
From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it>
Subject: Re: elusive segfault on latest snapshots
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20100801191435.GB6255@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--- Dom 1/8/10, Christopher Faylor  ha scritto:

> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 05:40:27PM
> +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >--- Sab 31/7/10, Christopher Faylor=A0 ha scritto:
> >
> >> -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:25:42AM +0000,
> Marco Atzeri
> >> wrote:
> >> >>on latest snapshots after 2010-07-07, I am
> picking
> >> random segfault
> >> >>building or configuring several programs
> >> >
> >> >Does this mean that 2010-07-07 does not have
> problems?
> >
> >yes, it works fine
> >
> >>=20
> >> Actually, I'd be particularly interested in
> knowing if
> >> 2010-07-18 has
> >> the problem.
> >
> >yes, it has.
> >
> >>=20
> >> cgf
> >>=20
> >
> >It is very elusive and it does not happen all the
> time,
> >just most of the time; every snapshot segfault in a=20
> >different point of the building and some time also
> >the same snapshot behavior differently.=20
> >
> >I guess is due to some type of race but no clue how to
> >pin point it.
>=20
> It's sort of a race but it's really more of an incredibly
> stupid thinko
> on my part owing to the fact that I "optimized" some of the
> signal
> handling.=A0 I almost knocked myself with the head slap
> out when I finally
> saw the simple problem.
>=20
> This should be fixed in today's snapshot.
>=20
> cgf
>=20

confirmed.
No problem building several packages using the 2010-08-01
snapshots.

Marco



=20=20=20


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple