X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <191029.22760.qm@web25503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:10:28 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: elusive segfault on latest snapshots To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20100801191435.GB6255@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Dom 1/8/10, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 05:40:27PM > +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >--- Sab 31/7/10, Christopher Faylor=A0 ha scritto: > > > >> -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:25:42AM +0000, > Marco Atzeri > >> wrote: > >> >>on latest snapshots after 2010-07-07, I am > picking > >> random segfault > >> >>building or configuring several programs > >> > > >> >Does this mean that 2010-07-07 does not have > problems? > > > >yes, it works fine > > > >>=20 > >> Actually, I'd be particularly interested in > knowing if > >> 2010-07-18 has > >> the problem. > > > >yes, it has. > > > >>=20 > >> cgf > >>=20 > > > >It is very elusive and it does not happen all the > time, > >just most of the time; every snapshot segfault in a=20 > >different point of the building and some time also > >the same snapshot behavior differently.=20 > > > >I guess is due to some type of race but no clue how to > >pin point it. >=20 > It's sort of a race but it's really more of an incredibly > stupid thinko > on my part owing to the fact that I "optimized" some of the > signal > handling.=A0 I almost knocked myself with the head slap > out when I finally > saw the simple problem. >=20 > This should be fixed in today's snapshot. >=20 > cgf >=20 confirmed. No problem building several packages using the 2010-08-01 snapshots. Marco =20=20=20 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple