X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <962517.70320.qm@web25505.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:40:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: elusive segfault on latest snapshots To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20100731172035.GA3617@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Sab 31/7/10, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: > -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:25:42AM +0000, Marco Atzeri > wrote: > >>on latest snapshots after 2010-07-07, I am picking > random segfault > >>building or configuring several programs > > > >Does this mean that 2010-07-07 does not have problems? yes, it works fine >=20 > Actually, I'd be particularly interested in knowing if > 2010-07-18 has > the problem. yes, it has. >=20 > cgf >=20 It is very elusive and it does not happen all the time, just most of the time; every snapshot segfault in a=20 different point of the building and some time also the same snapshot behavior differently.=20 I guess is due to some type of race but no clue how to pin point it. Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple