X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C48DDC6.7080704@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:09:42 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-specific gcc question References: <4C476C7C DOT 8070803 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4C476C7C.8070803@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 21/07/2010 22:54, Eric Blake wrote: > Is there any sane reason that: > > gcc -E -dD -o - foo.c > > generates ./-.exe on cygwin, rather than outputting to stdout like on > every other platform? This tripped up an autoconf test. Fortunately, > removing '-o -' appears to be portable. I've seen that too, but didn't know that the malbehaviour of this (and iirc also -M options) was cygwin-specific at all. Would you file a PR upstream please? cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple