X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: From: Karl M To: Subject: Re: cygport cross-compiling beta1 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:27:33 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: cygport cross-compiling beta1 > From: yselkowitz > Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:21:44 -0500 >=20 >> But...somebody out there might have (cygwin) code that doesn't compile >> with gcc4. They ought to fix their code, but...this is not an ideal worl= d. >=20 > Distros maintain patches for still-in-use older software to fix > compatibility with new GCCs. Otherwise, yes, they'll actually have to > fix their code. But let's face it, most distros don't support gcc-3.4 > anymore, certainly not as a primary compiler, so why must we, > particularly given our limited resources? >=20 Couldn't this be handled by the Cygwin time machine? =20 Thanks, =20 ...Karl=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with H= otmail.=20 http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=3Dmulticalendar&ocid=3D= PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple