X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C3B3BEF.7080201@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:59:43 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin extremely slow after updating from 1.5.1 to 1.7.5 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Am 12.07.2010 03:00, schrieb Jet Thompson: > It is now taking over 30 seconds for bash to come up, > whereas in 1.5 it would take 1-2 seconds. > > Doing an ls of my ~ directory takes 5 seconds. > > Running a cucumber test takes 5-6 minutes. > > Any idea what could be causing this? Virus, Spyware and similar scanners, and broken software. > At this point, I can not use Cygwin for development. > Not feasible to use such a slow environment. > > Hope someone may have some good ideas. > I am using an older XP machine, but still it is > dual 2.8 Xeon processors, 800MHz bus, 7200rpm > sata hard drive with 8MB cache. It is painful > to see such dismal performance. ls isn't representative, as it uses stat() which is painfully slow on Cygwin. If bash is slow to start, see if uninstalling bash-completion fixes it. For me it helped quite a bit. -- Matthias Andree -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple