X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: cmake and fortran From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <295090.3830.qm@web25504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <295090 DOT 3830 DOT qm AT web25504 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:27:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1278710852.7240.4.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:50 +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote: > as lapack is moving to cmake as build system, > I started to playing with cmake and I suspect no one > tried before cmake and fortran together on cygwin. > > The definition file > /usr/share/cmake-2.6.4/Modules/Platform/CYGWIN-g77.cmake > is clearly wrong. It tries to build libxxx.dll and so on. > > Attached the one that I am currently using, copied and modified > from CYGWIN-g77.cmake that seems right. > > Could the cmake maintainer give a check and eventually > report the issue upstream ? I'm not the cmake maintainer, but could you try Ports' cmake-2.8.1-11 and see if that's any better? Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple