X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:04:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Weird directories on Windows share when using rm to delete a directory
Message-ID: <20100707130411.GC4871@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4C2D161C DOT 4090608 AT cygwin DOT com> <AANLkTilm753Nc34EKLOlfkOrqsWKNPh5vdrmbjrShDNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100702144225 DOT GE8163 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTinBrtrZe-YKqNWtdMVL0teYauVUr8qFoJ_XwmC9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100702160651 DOT GF8163 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTikfPRai2YXSiL_8LAVmdXkTkcIDzDVwkadz7sIa AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100706080251 DOT GN6521 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTilGSpy5z_wW_WEyWw-jCYE5Fkja7FKRRFPgB3uI AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100707084601 DOT GD22451 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTilO8u8EQ6AfsoKMlOqKUTgV50pjnr-e7AZ16QpZ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilO8u8EQ6AfsoKMlOqKUTgV50pjnr-e7AZ16QpZ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:56:30AM -0700, Slide wrote:
><snip>
>
>> Thanks for your help. ?This problem should be fixed now in CVS.
>> I switched off the entire mechanism which tries to resolve sharing
>> violations for netapp drives.
>>
>> What happens is this:
>>
>> The netapp drive is thoroughly confused when trying to move-and-delete
>> a file or directory using a single handle. ?In case of directories it
>> moves the directories and the subsequent delete call returns success
>> without actually having succeeded. ?In case of files, renaming the file
>> fails with "sharing violation" and the subsequent call for deletion
>> fails with "file has been moved" (I guess you see the confusion here).
>> Above all, when trying to remove a directory tree, after all files in a
>> directory have been removed, opening the directory with only the
>> FILE_SHARE_DELETE sharing flag set fails with a ... sharing violation.
>
>Thanks very much for the awesome and speedy response to this issue.
>This will help keep me sane for a little while longer :-)

Given Corinna's explanation of the problem, please consider filing a
bug report with NetApp.  I know that they'll want to hear about this.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple