X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <29073093.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 23:13:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "kenny AT ca" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: R: Building DLLs on C++ version code failed, but okay on C version code. In-Reply-To: <769164.44389.qm@web25502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <29068199 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <769164 DOT 44389 DOT qm AT web25502 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com thank you all. You all are right. I got the desired dlls. Now I know I was misleaded by the statement that GCC is a collection of compilers and it automatically use a compiler according to a programming language. Marco atzeri-3 wrote: > > --- Dom 4/7/10, kenny AT ca ha scritto: > >> >> Hi there, >> >> I wrote a file, hello.c. It has only one function: print a >> message like >> "hello!". >> ##### hello.c ######### >> #include >> void hello() { printf( "Hello.\n" ) ; } >> >> $gcc -c hello.c >> $gcc -shared -o hello.dll hello.o >> >> I successufully built it as DLL, hello.dll. >> >> Then, I rewrote it in c++. >> ##### hello.cpp ####### >> #include >> using namespace std ; >> void hello() {cout << "Hello." << endl ;} >> >> Then, I used the commands above to built DLL, but it >> failed. Why did it >> fail? > > wrong compiler ? > For C++ you need a C++ compiler > > $g++ -c hello.cpp > $g++ -shared -o hello.dll hello.o > > Marco > > PS: this is not a cygwin issue, it is a "very" basic one. > > > > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Building-DLLs-on-C%2B%2B-version-code-failed%2C-but-okay-on-C-version-code.-tp29068199p29073093.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple