X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: mjD.OBqswBAPbVUxYJaYPvc61jLEnpq8VnBwJGdbEJOPA9xw Message-ID: <4C306C3A.1080205@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:10:50 +0000 From: Greg Chicares User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Building DLLs on C++ version code failed, but okay on C version code. References: <29068199 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: <29068199.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2010-07-04 10:24Z, kenny AT ca wrote: > > $gcc -c hello.c > $gcc -shared -o hello.dll hello.o > > I successufully built it as DLL, hello.dll. Here, the C runtime library is automatically linked. > Then, I rewrote it in c++. [...] > Then, I used the commands above to built DLL, but it failed. Why did it > fail? Use 'g++' instead of 'gcc' for C++: g++ -c hello.cpp g++ -shared -o hello.dll hello.o Then the C++ standard library is automatically linked. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple