Message-ID: <4C2A725A.8030802@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:23:22 -0400
From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: rebaseall [1.7]: cyggcc_s-1.dll error
References: <1277822045 DOT 12015 DOT 1382454075 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> <4C2A04C9 DOT 5000202 AT redhat DOT com> <20100629144014 DOT GA25176 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20100629144014.GA25176@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6/29/2010 10:40 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 06/29/2010 08:34 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>>> Phooey.  dash now depends on cyggcc_s-1.dll, so rebaseall needs to be
>>>> taught to add this library to the list of exemptions (similar to
>>>> cygwin1.dll).
>>>
>>> Or dash could be rebuilt using -static-libgcc.  It's not like dash needs
>>> to worry about throwing C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries, and if
>>> dash is meant to be a /bin/sh implementation (even if cygwin still uses
>>> bash for that), then IMO it ought to be -- insofar as is possible --
>>> statically linked.
>>
>> OK, I'm now trying to figure out how to add -static-libgcc into my
>> cygport file.  Look for an updated dash later today...
>
> In the meantime, you might want to consider linking dash with -static-libgcc.

You know, I thought of that too but then I thought, it's probably better that
dash is statically linked with libgcc instead.

;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple