X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:33:30 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.6 snapshot: intermittent "CreateProcessW failed" Message-ID: <20100629103330.GE8163@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100628183440 DOT GA18422 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100629083055 DOT GZ8163 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 29 10:48, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 29 June 2010 09:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 29 09:16, Andy Koppe wrote: > >> > >>       4 [main] sh 396 fork: child -1 - CreatProcessW failed for > >> '\??\C:\bin\sh.exe', errno 2 > > > > Looks like the path is missing a directory.  I assume you didn't > > install Cygwin to C:\ but to C:\cygwin, right?  Or does the path > > make sense when ignoring the NT prefix "\??\"? > > The path is correct. > > C:/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto) > C:/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto) > C: on / type ntfs (binary,auto) Urgh. I hope you know what you're doing... However, I didn't immediately realize that "\??\C:\bin\sh.exe" is the exact string used in the call to CreateProcessW. Which is wrong, of course, since \??\ is a native NT path. That should be "\\?\" when calling a Win32 wide char function. I found two lines in the code which accidentally copied a native NT path into the WCHAR process name storage, rather than the Win32 path. I fixed that in CVS, but since I couldn't reproduce the problem yet, it would be helpful if you could test it. > Unfortunately the top-level make just exits early before really doing > anything if I run it through strace (see below). It starts doing > actual work if I add '-f' to the strace arguments, but then of course > strace no longer captures events in sub-makes, which is where the > problem occurs. Hmm. Did you run make from a mintty? Does it work if you start it from a Windows console in notty mode? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple