X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Need swig 1.3.40 for Subversion From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <4C224A9C.3050500@acm.org> References: <4C1FD3E8 DOT 50308 AT acm DOT org> <1277260203 DOT 5496 DOT 36 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4C224A9C DOT 3050500 AT acm DOT org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:06:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1277323561.5452.81.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 10:55 -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: > It doesn't build with swig 2.0.0 and I don't have time to investigate > why. The swig bindings are generated fine, but they don't compile. SWIG is *very* annoying. Why can't they keep some sort of compatibility between versions? Alright, I suppose I'll have to package 1.3.40 as curr:, but as I already built 2.0.0 I'll make it test:. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple