X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Python 2.6 - ctypes (specifically _ctypes) cannot be imported - Eclipse pydev integration broken as a result From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <20100623195509.GA20520@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <1277282895 DOT 5496 DOT 47 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20100623112002 DOT GA2828 AT tishler DOT net> <1277322718 DOT 5452 DOT 63 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20100623195509 DOT GA20520 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:04:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1277323442.5452.78.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 15:55 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I've opted for using the union of previous and curr requirements but > that's not really too great either. This is one of many places where > we could use a real package manager. And you're not the only one. The problem with that is it can pull in old libraries which (if nothing else depends on them) are simply not necessary, and e.g. on my system, ImageBase real estate is at a premium. Here's a radical question: do we really need to allow for multiple versions of every package? Other distros don't do this, why should we? Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple