X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <503330.55948.qm@web111704.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <20100622054429 DOT GA27529 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100622143530 DOT GA29309 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100622192024 DOT GA30507 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:14:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Stacey Campbell Subject: Re: Fortune and the "fortune startrek" command To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20100622192024.GA30507@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Paraphrasing: >[C]haracter flaws [of Cygwin project participants] have nothing to do >with cygwin itself. I'd disagree with that. The Cygwin project is a volunteer effort, correct? Potential developers are more likely to volunteer if they see respect and cooperation on lists such as this. I've followed the project and used Cygwin for longer than I care to remember. My semi-objective view of Cygwin on Win 7 is that quality has plummeted on that platform. Cygwin needs volunteers. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple