X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C2125BA.3040300@acm.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:06:02 -0700 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libproxy-devel-0.4.0-1 missing libproxy.la References: <4C212153 DOT 8010804 AT acm DOT org> In-Reply-To: <4C212153.8010804@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 6/22/2010 1:47 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: > My subversion build dies because it can't find /usr/lib/libproxy.la. > libproxy-devel-0.2.3-1 contained this file, but -0.4.0-1 does not. > > Is this a packaging error? Or do I need to try to work around this in > the subversion build? It seems that /usr/lib/libproxy.la is coming from /usr/lib/libneon.la. libneon27 depends on libproxy0. So, if libproxy-devel is fixed to provide /usr/lib/libproxy.la, do I also need a new libneon package linked against libproxy1? -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org This night methinks is but the daylight sick. -- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice" -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple