X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <3113.95153.qm@web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:13:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: bug in NINT() in gfortran To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <4C13949C.40500@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Sab 12/6/10, Dave Korn ha scritto: > Aagaard Jensen wrote: > > The NINT() intrinsic in current gfortran under cygwin > has a bug. Below follows: >=20 > =A0 Thanks for the report.=A0 This appears to be the > same or similar to a problem > that's cropping up in the gfortran testsuite results (a > FAIL in a test related > to atan2) that as it happens I was just looking at > yesterday, and my > investigations so far suggest that it's actually a problem > in the underlying > maths functions in newlib.=A0 I'll reply to this thread > when I figure out what's > going on. >=20 > =A0 =A0 cheers, > =A0 =A0 =A0 DaveK >=20 it seems a fault coming from newlib lround #include #include int main (void) { double x =3D 132843.61283756854; int k,i; for( i=3D0 ; i<=3D7 ; i++ ) { k =3D (int) lround (x); printf ("%f %d \n", x, k); x =3D 10.0 *x; } } $ ./prova 132843.612838 132844 1328436.128376 -1596096578 13284361.283757 13284361 132843612.837569 132843613 1328436128.375685 1328436128 13284361283.756851 -2147483648 132843612837.568512 -2147483648 1328436128375.685059 -2147483648 It is curious that lroundf=20 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D33177 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-08/msg00642.html has not such bug. Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple