X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:25:55 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bug report: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too 	smal
Message-ID: <20100608082555.GM8163@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20100607194146 DOT GA31697 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C0D4FB7 DOT 7060307 AT 12000 DOT org> <20100607201507 DOT GA5183 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C0D57CD DOT 1030908 AT 12000 DOT org> <4C0D60DE DOT 4040101 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C0D9381 DOT 3080506 AT 12000 DOT org> <4C0DA501 DOT 8050402 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4C0DAD7C DOT 2090007 AT 12000 DOT org> <AANLkTilt8j_pFoDy9ttJzk4CUVRGQcjwAVIoP5ZCZDYC AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C0DF735 DOT 1020203 AT 12000 DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C0DF735.1020203@12000.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jun  8 00:54, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> On 6/8/2010 12:46 AM, Alexander T wrote:
> >There is a similar post from 2009 where the conclusion is that this
> >can be caused by very deep forking
> >(http://readlist.com/lists/cygwin.com/cygwin/6/34359.html). Is it
> >possible that the make script does very deep, or is stuck in infinite,
> >recursion?
> 
> Yes, I know, I saw the above, and I did point that message when I
> first reported the problem:
> 
> http://readlist.com/lists/cygwin.com/cygwin/8/44577.html
> 
> May be then this bug has been there for a year now.

You missed http://readlist.com/lists/cygwin.com/cygwin/6/34365.html

This bug has been fixed for a year now.  Your bug is something else.
I'm still waiting for some helpful debugging like an strace or, even
better, a simple testcase in plain C.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple