X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4C096D3B.6020709@redhat.com> References: <4C03D6C5 DOT 4050004 AT x-ray DOT at> <80373222dd5d43b134a5ede7036e7674 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <20100602080626 DOT GV16885 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <20100602174848 DOT GA14172 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100603235944 DOT GA12167 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100604024422 DOT GB12167 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <78e7b77657c0cfcd63dc22ad9679bc85 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <20100604045807 DOT GC12167 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <2570318aabfa537bf24c8d3a55f9dcd4 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <4C092F96 DOT 5040800 AT cygwin DOT com> <7a1785a5f0a1d0a8956cd10e573f2e53 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <4C094B0D DOT 5010406 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <3e610509cb846e12307dfc94c646f445 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <4C096D3B DOT 6020709 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:37:01 -0700 Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat() From: "Christopher Wingert" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com He is? Holy crap, he is more helpful with his sarcasm and doubt than anything else. However, it does explains his tone, given that I am picking on his code. I see your reference to an acronym regarding top posting, but not a policy. In fact your reference is specifically listed under another obscure acronym OLOCA, which does not reference any policy. If you want to have a policy regarding top posting you should put it here: http://www.cygwin.com/lists.html FWIW, I think inline posting is very 90's. Your point get lost. Finally, I am serious and I am not looking for any further friends (I have enough). I am doing analysis and looking at code that shows how we can make great software better. If that's not welcome because of the format of my emails then I'll stop. Chris > On 06/04/2010 03:14 PM, Christopher Wingert wrote: >> Agreed, I would like to make a global change, however, unless I can talk >> to the current maintainer of the fhandler* functions, it seems illogical >> for me to change them (as I have about a week of cygwin dll experience). > > You ARE talking to the maintainer of the fhandler* functions - cgf knows > what he's talking about, since he wrote the bulk of them. > > And QUIT top-posting - by violating list policy, you aren't winning any > friends. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU > Prove that you are serious about helping, by showing a modicum of honest > effort to obey list policy. > > -- > Eric Blake eblake AT redhat DOT com +1-801-349-2682 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple