X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:48:48 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat() Message-ID: <20100602174848.GA14172@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100530170747 DOT GA8605 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C03D6C5 DOT 4050004 AT x-ray DOT at> <80373222dd5d43b134a5ede7036e7674 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> <20100602080626 DOT GV16885 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7 DOT squirrel AT www DOT webmail DOT wingert DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:46:03AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: >Thanks for the pointer, I just gave it a whirl, it actually didn't make >much of a difference. > >I am going to start looking into making a patch. Let me point out that the kind of slowdown that you are seeing is not something that I would consider acceptable. So what I'd like to see is an analysis of *why* Cygwin is so slow rather than a band-aid which uses an environment variable or different api to work around a real problem. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple