X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:37:50 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-1.7.5: intptr_t/uintptr_t types and PRI?PTR/SCI?PTR format specfiers are inconsistent Message-ID: <20100526133750.GK10652@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On May 24 14:19, Matthew Fluet wrote: > /usr/include/stdint.h typedefs intptr_t as "int" and uintptr_t as > "unsigned int". > /usr/include/inttypes.h #defines PRIdPTR as "ld" and PRIoPTR as "lo". > These and the other PRI?PTR and SCN?PTR format specifiers are meant to > be used for the intptr_t and uintptr_t types (thus, making them usable > without needing to know their exact type definitions). > > This inconsistency leads to warnings from gcc. (There is also a > potential calling-convention mismatch, though not on x86.) intptr_t and uintptr_t in stdint.h have been changed back in 2009 to avoid some inconsistencies with the original definition. Unfortunaltey we missed out on inttypes.h. I checked in a fix. Thanks for the report, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple