X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <op.vcx9k9q81e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>
References: <AANLkTik_jo0N1YtUTFLzsqAsv5OkkyjCG9epeMq55bWk AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <op DOT vcop6qoo1e62zd AT merlin DOT emma DOT line DOT org>	 <AANLkTikoAoUAarNLwuIHe6GypKg62rjKR1VPyQYygT17 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <20100514192202 DOT GB8785 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <u1vd9ahgy DOT fsf AT acm DOT org>	 <20100518143136 DOT GB5909 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	 <4BF2A806 DOT 9030603 AT redhat DOT com>	 <20100518150957 DOT GA7838 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	 <AANLkTin7KqzhnMG0Zdc0hP6YRUjJGhGLwfwF8K8vOOgt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <op DOT vcx9k9q81e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 11:05:45 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTilzhFauWZU65g9oXxtwHBXqD60bCw2AKqa32yMd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: vfork always fail problem
From: Huang Bambo <bambo DOT huang AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Huang,
>
> you - as the person who first saw and documented the problem in public
> (thank you!) - are in the best position to test it, if you can recreate the
> original situation (with the GBK(?) directory names).
>
> It would be beneficial to all of us, and you would be doing everybody a
> favour (if you wish, which is your choice), if you could test if the problem
> reproduces with Cygwin 1.7.5, and goes away with the snapshot.

fork() now work well but find new problem after use the 0518 patch.
Usually I use mintty to as the default term tool. After use this patch, I can't
directly use mintty to open the first shell( like nothing happened), I
must use Cygwin.bat to create
a fist shell, then use short cut of mintty in the start menu to open others.

I'll find out why if I have time.

Thak you.

Best

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple