X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BF3FC7A.8030705@bopp.net> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:02 -0500 From: Jeremy Bopp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash - command - PATH question References: <3185EFAF9C8F7B4E9DBDF56829BF7C78378E8F0B AT srv060ex01 DOT ssd DOT fsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: <3185EFAF9C8F7B4E9DBDF56829BF7C78378E8F0B@srv060ex01.ssd.fsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote: > Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that: > > $ foo > > returns the error: > > bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory What happens when you directly run ./bin/foo? What is the shebang (first line) of foo? > BUT since foo is *really in* PATH, e.g., > > $ `which foo` > > runs correctly? What is the output of "which foo" in this case? -Jeremy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple