X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinlxAegxos680xwsaQghasduerkeNfinI66VLV0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilNtTrx2Z9ubWBLcedCC38AXaYBm59y439_oBtb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <mqviu5heetrembtcjea3is758g06lafpek AT 4ax DOT com>	 <ms45v591808h8890svcipugqf5esuco9ql AT 4ax DOT com>	 <20100518172806 DOT GA21055 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	 <838w7hnm7t DOT fsf AT garydjones DOT name>	 <AANLkTilP8V3zWnDnyYw9gKf2xk6bAf-3Z6try5kDNAKx AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <20100518191641 DOT GA2472 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	 <AANLkTinlxAegxos680xwsaQghasduerkeNfinI66VLV0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 21:29:37 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikuyb7XJP-UnakrwXJTFaM9pTc_jd8wvYSRasR7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand
From: Berthold Barth <berthold DOT barth AT googlemail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Berthold Barth
<berthold DOT barth AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
>> To reiterate, I am not interested in collaborating with anyone on web
>> site redesign and, as I said, I don't think a mascot is called for. =A0By
>> mascot, I mean an image displayed on the web site.
>
> If that is your opinion about what is best for Cygwin and the
> community then as a core maintainer, it is of course your
>

prerogative to deny any kind of design improvement. At least I tried.

Sorry for the split post, I have no idea how that happened.

Cheers, Berthold

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple