X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <577696.61595.qm@web25502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <577696 DOT 61595 DOT qm AT web25502 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> From: David Eisner Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:43:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > It is not really polite to ask others to change something > without making your effort to do the job. Marco, I don't think you carefully read the thread. Regarding the web design, there's already a website mockup. Regarding the logo, it doesn't make sense for Berthold to invest effort in designing a new logo without 1. Some indication that it will be used. 2. Some sort of feedback on requirements. I think at this point (on the logo front, at least), we're just looking for something like, "Yes, we would indeed welcome an updated logo, Berthold. We're in a time crunch right now, but at some time in the near future we'll get back to you with some thoughts on what we'd like, and maybe we can reach a consensus. At that point some initial sketches / proposals would be welcome." -David -- David Eisner http://cradle.brokenglass.com -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple