X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand From: Berthold Barth To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > So my questions remain. =A0Christopher and Corinna, if you don't think a > redesign is a good idea, then please tell us that. > > Thanks, > Andrew. I'm currently pretty busy, otherwise I would already have gone ahead and changed the subject to something they would notice (along the lines of "ATTN Chris and Corinna: Teh Redesign"). As it stands, I'm afraid I can't even make rough sketches because frankly, I'm not the Cygwin core audience and as such my messages may well be way off. So yeah, I'd appreciate them chiming in on this as well. Cheers, Berthold -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple