X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com connect(): No such file or directory From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:05:04 -0400 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > I've used Cygwin on and off for a few years now, and today while I was > on the site I thought how much a good, recognisable logo and graphic > design could do for Cygwin exposure. For one, more users also mean > more potential contributors, to the project itself and to compatible > software alike (hopefully swaying some devs towards native linux + > cygwin instead of native win + wine). In addition, concise design > helps first time users find answers to their most troubling questions > faster and with less help, reducing support load. Could Christopher and/or Corinna please weigh in on this? There seem to be a lot of ideas and energy behind this project, but I don't think the discussion can go much further until we hear from them. Is either of you interested in having a redesign of cygwin.com? What would be your criteria for an acceptable redesign? Thanks, Andrew. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple