X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:16:51 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xdr naming difference Message-ID: <20100504131651.GA14234@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4BE0178F DOT 9040206 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BE0178F.9040206@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On May 4 06:48, Eric Blake wrote: > glibc provides xdr_uint{8,16,32,64}_t, but while cygwin exports those > functions, the header rpc/xdr.h only declares xdr_u_int{8,16,32,64}_t > (note the extra underscore). Likewise, the IXDR_PUT_INT32 macro is > missing. These differences in the cygwin version tripped up compilation > of libvirt on cygwin [1]. Can we get aliases added to provide the glibc > spelling of these four functions, so we can remove the libvirt hacks? Are you really talking about the rpc/xdr.h header provided by newlib? All of what you're missing is in that file. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple