X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2w5520d94f1004291613z68654a49ma665296c6557ac29@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100123171936 DOT GE23796 AT err>	 <1847a1f034b137ba0d95d8a866bfc070 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com>	 <28354068 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>	 <m2w5520d94f1004291613z68654a49ma665296c6557ac29 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0400
Message-ID: <l2kb609cb3b1004291949u902739a6w295047bf26b10826@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems
From: NightStrike <nightstrike AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:13 PM, greenup greenup <greenup AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> This is an old problem, the last I heard on it was something along the li=
nes of:
> "Cygwin's functionality/compatibility/robustness improved in necessary
> ways, but performance was required to suffer"
> From a hearsay perspective, it appears to be related to fork/exec
> performance, and more specifically probably related to proper memory
> allocation/management.
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-05/msg00387.html
>
> I'd say "Try using Colinux", but they haven't gotten their 64 bit act
> together yet. =A0(barely decided they're going to try)
>
> One other time I was frustrated and got 50% improvement using a
> smaller shell, (sh) but really that's a drop in the bucket,
> performance-wise.

Port cygwin to win64 via mingw-w64 :) :)

(We'll help if you can do it...)

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple