X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:58:04 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Filtered tokens Message-ID: <20100427135804.GH1845@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100427091011 DOT GB12365 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100427132614 DOT GG1845 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 27 09:33, Patrick Julien wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: > > On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote: > >> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in session 0? > > > > Because it's started in session 0.  Creating our own session for each user > > could result in an enormous memory leak. > > That's how the regular logon does it, don't see why it has to leak. I meant in case of an error but, never mind. The basic problem is that Cygwin doesn't constitute a remote desktop logon server. A session can only be created by a trusted logon process. There isn;'t a simple API to request a new session ID. Additionally, on client machines RDP only allows one user RDP session. If, say, an ssh login would request a session, the request would either be refused, or it would lock the console window. Only on real RDP servers you can have multiple sessions. > > That's because setup works that way.  If you want the ownership of the > > files being administrator, start setup as administrator. > > Gee thanks, yeah, I got that, I still think it's a security issue, > that is, a bug. See the original post, any program can read/write to > any executable in cygwin without escalation because I'm the owner. No, it isn't. If you're admin you have this right anyway and non-admin users still have restricted access to the files. Just because UAC exists, it's not automatically a good concept. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple