X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
connect(): No such file or directory
From: Paul Bibbings <paul DOT bibbings AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: gcc: building gcc-4.5.0 for Cygwin
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:43:16 +0100
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <87sk6phbyz.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87y6go3743 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4BC904E3 DOT 60500 AT verizon DOT net> 	<878w8lx1kt DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4BCD9A2A DOT 9060906 AT gmail DOT com> 	<87eii92aac DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4BCE3B5D DOT 2020909 AT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> writes:

> On 20/04/2010 20:28, Paul Bibbings wrote:
>
>> (BTW.  I'm guessing by "That'd be my fault" that you're working on gcc
>> upstream?)
>
>   I certainly am; my long-term goal is a) to synchronize upstream and
> downstream so that in the end there are no cygwin-specific patches needed and
> anyone can just build the plain sources from upstream and get a fully
> compatible compiler that generates fully compatible executables, and b) to add
> any missing support so that we can get features like LTO and graphite working.
>
>   I think we're fairly close to there already, but there might be some minor
> incompatibilities in odd corners of C++ related to typeinfos and dynamic
> typecasts.

Well, then, I very much look forward to the fruits of all that hard
work and am grateful that it appears to be in `safe hands'.  And, well,
... thank you! :-)

Good luck with that.

Regards

Paul Bibbings


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple