X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_BF,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BCE3D22.90908@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:47:46 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Python 2.6 status References: <005101cadfdc$3f2c0890$bd8419b0$@com> <20100419194404 DOT GD1376 AT tishler DOT net> <4BCE387D DOT 9000905 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4BCE387D.9000905@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2010-04-20 18:27, Dave Korn wrote: > On 19/04/2010 20:44, Jason Tishler wrote: > >> 2. Yaakov recently created a libffi patch that I haven't had a chance to >> test yet. > > Please CC me into this discussion. I've put a lot of work into fixing > libffi in GCC, and then porting the patches to upstream libffi; I'd like to > know if there's anything missing. The patch isn't for libffi per se, but for Python to find libffi in GCC's directories instead of /usr/{include,lib}/ (or more specifically, not look so hard for it). Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple