X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,TW_CP,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BCD9E4E.9050309@gmail.com> References: <20100419211600 DOT 197240 AT gmx DOT net> <4BCD9E4E DOT 9050309 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:06:59 +0200 Received: by 10.213.40.201 with SMTP id l9mr3527605ebe.28.1271772419855; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: cppcheck bugs From: Csaba Raduly To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 19/04/2010 22:16, Martin Ettl wrote: >> I used cppcheck >> [../machine/mips/strncpy.c:205] > > =A0Uhh, why is it telling us about the MIPS-only version of strncpy in ne= wlib > that we don't even compile in? > AIUI, that's because cppcheck tries every possible combination of macros. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify that a certain macro is always defined/never defined (i.e. check just one combination). For example, in our software we have #defines like WIN32, LINUX, SOLARIS, etc where only one can be defined at any one time. cppcheck tries every possible value and (when there are other macros) usually gives up because of too many different combinations. >> [../../../winsup/utils/cygcheck.cc:1161]: (Error) Mismatching allocation= and deallocation: f >> [../../../winsup/utils/cygcheck.cc:1168]: (Error) Mismatching allocation= and deallocation: f >> [../../../winsup/utils/cygcheck.cc:1159]: (Error) Resource leak: f If that's dump_sysinfo_services(), then the usage looks indeed suspect to m= e. if ((f =3D popen (buf, "rt")) =3D=3D NULL) return; if (ferror (f) || feof (f) || ret =3D=3D EOF || maj < 1 || min < 10) return; ////////// pclose is not called after successful popen, line = 1159 fclose (f); ////////// shouldn't this be pclose ? line 1161 if ((f =3D popen (buf, "rt")) =3D=3D NULL) // line 1168 looks consistent = with below return; if (verbose) pclose (f); else { pclose (f); if (nchars > 0) for (char *srv =3D strtok (buf, "\n"); srv; srv =3D strtok (NULL, "= \n")) { if ((f =3D popen (buf2, "rt")) =3D=3D NULL) return; pclose (f); } else no_services =3D true; } >> [../../../winsup/cygwin/child_info.h:65]: (Error) Class child_info which= is inherited by class child_info_spawn does not have a virtual destructor > > =A0Pretty sure it's meant to be that way for a reason. Should not be an issue unless a derived-class object is freed through a base-class pointer. --=20 Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "OK, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torv= alds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple