X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG45 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BCD05C1.20609@gmail.com> References: <4BCD05C1 DOT 20609 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:31:09 -0400 Received: by 10.216.185.136 with SMTP id u8mr559259wem.24.1271727069813; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for changes to behavior in package list From: Robert Pendell To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 19/04/2010 19:31, Robert Pendell wrote: > >> First suggestion: Implement a prompt when a selected package has >> caused other packages to be marked as well. =C2=A0This dialog would incl= ude >> the newly marked packages with a Yes/No prompt if the user wants them >> marked. =C2=A0A warning could note that the packages may be required for >> the currently selected package to function. =C2=A0The user could pick no >> and continue clicking away in the event they are going to uninstall it >> anyways which is a couple more clicks away. > >> Second suggestion: Change the order of package options to Keep, >> Uninstall, Reinstall, Source. =C2=A0This loop should prevent packages fr= om >> being re-selected during intended uninstall actions such as may happen >> with the X11 packages. > > =C2=A0For the second one, I'm still working on a patch that gives a right= -click > context menu, so that you can simply jump directly to the choice you want > without going via the intermediate choices; this should at least help a b= it. > (It is taking longer than I expected because I kept running into and fixi= ng > bugs on the way, and I'm also busy trying to get a gcc-4.5 release at the= same > time, but I haven't forgotten.) > > =C2=A0For the first one, it was suggested in the earlier discussion to ke= ep track > of things that have only been added because they are dependencies, and ke= ep > track of things that have been deliberately selected by the user. =C2=A0T= hen again, > it might be even simpler yet, if we just delay adding the dependencies un= til > the user has clicked 'next' on the package choice screen, and calculate t= hem > all once at the end. =C2=A0(There are also other possibilities that come = to mind > that would be a combination of or half-way between the two.) > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0cheers, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0DaveK > Ahh... Ok. Thanks. ;) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple