X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_BF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:44:04 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Python 2.6 status Message-id: <20100419194404.GD1376@tishler.net> Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <005101cadfdc$3f2c0890$bd8419b0$@com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <005101cadfdc$3f2c0890$bd8419b0$@com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hugh, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:20:37AM -0600, Hugh Davis wrote: > The last postings regarding Python 2.6 mentioned needing a coordinated > effort with all the packages that have dependencies on python. Is > there a status on how this effort is coming? Any estimate on when an > experimental or final package might be available? As of last week, I have a releasable Cygwin Python 2.6 with the following caveats: 1. It is not built against libncursesw-devel, but Python 2.6 added ncursesw support. 2. Yaakov recently created a libffi patch that I haven't had a chance to test yet. I would like to release an experimental Cygwin Python 2.6 and then resolve the above (IMO) minor issues in a follow-up release. Any objections? Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple