Message-id: <4BCC933B.3060205@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:30:35 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320  Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems starting sshd as a service on  cygwin 1.7.3
References: <62688 DOT 30561 DOT qm AT web111403 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-reply-to: <62688.30561.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 4/19/2010 12:57 PM, Myron Flickner wrote:
> On one machine sshd startup still fails with a " QueryServiceStatus:  Win32
> error 1062:"  even after upgrading to cygwin 1.7.5-1.   If it fails the log
> file \var\log\sshd.log is not created.
>
> If I run the script below I can get sshd to start.  I've tried this with
> symantec firewall off/on - no difference.
> #!/bin/bash
> set -x
>
> cygrunsrv -S sshd
> until [ 0 == $? ] ; do
>    sleep 1 ;
>    cygrunsrv -S sshd ;
> done
>
> cygrunsrv -V -Q sshd
>
> How can I trace this issue ?

Still sounds like BLODA to me.  What else do you have on your system
that could be trying to manage/control/protect file access?  The fact
that you can eventually get it to start suggests there's nothing wrong
with the configuration and that it's just a matter of timing.  So you
have some dependency in your network stack (perhaps) that isn't ready
when sshd is starting or something is actively inhibiting a dependency.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple