X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:05:04 -0500 Received: by 10.141.213.22 with SMTP id p22mr7088882rvq.131.1271250304349; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Poderosa problem in 1.7 From: Rance Hall To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:11 AM, PJ Whitelock wrote: > > Does anyone have a work around for Poderosa's incompatability with cygwin 1.7, ie looking for mount points in the registry when they're no longer there. Can you just create a fake registry entry with the same info as the fstab? > I very much liked poderosa for many reasons, cygwin interoperability and the serial port plugin to name 2. Apparently however, poderosa has been orphaned by its authors and there has been no update to the program to Windows 7 support, 64 bit support, or the new cygwin. As a result, I gave up on it. Adding the registry entries that poderosa is looking for SHOULD work. But I can't help test it. As I havent had poderosa installed for some time and have gone on to other tools. Rance -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple