X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:05:21 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST YOUR FS Message-ID: <20100408080521.GK18530@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1270678042 DOT 14260 DOT 1368807709 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1270678042.14260.1368807709@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 7 18:07, Charles Wilson wrote: > MVFS (ClearCase dynamic view) seems to work fine with both "foo." and " > foo ". > > We have a few "network drives" that do not: > > $ touch foo. > touch: cannot touch `foo.': No such file or directory > > $ touch " foo " > touch: cannot touch ` foo ': No such file or directory > > One is a simple shared NTFS drive, I think (volinfo-1.txt). The other is > a weird distributed filesystem of some kind (volinfo-2.txt). Both are no NTFS, otherwise the FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION would be TRUE. They are very likely Netapp. From the flag values I'd assume that Cygwin already recognizes them as netapp. What does `mount' print? Thanks for testing, btw. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple