X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:38:20 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: scp no longer reports incremental progress Message-ID: <20100406133819.GB16284@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <806a89db1003291509t34fb9e26y84a9c8a212f64a6d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4BB125E5 DOT 2020203 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100329221438 DOT GA8111 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100331181715 DOT GB20959 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100401144305 DOT GA31187 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4BB4C735 DOT 4070802 AT gmx DOT de> <20100401163707 DOT GH18364 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 05:06:38PM +0300, Matthias Andree wrote: >So let's get the network out of the picture. I also observe: > >20100328, no processes running, ash -c "rebaseall -v" starts logging dll >names after < 1 s. > >20100331, same situation, ash -c "rebaseall -v" shows no output. Note I'm >not waiting very long, if the system has become an order of magnitude >slower or goof up flushing console output that would also count as >regression. It's hard to see how this could be in any way related. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple