X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <op.vahutn051e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>
References: <806a89db1003291509t34fb9e26y84a9c8a212f64a6d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <4BB125E5 DOT 2020203 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> 	 <20100329221438 DOT GA8111 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> 	 <20100331181715 DOT GB20959 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> 	 <op DOT vahfgdd01e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de> 	 <20100401144305 DOT GA31187 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4BB4C735 DOT 4070802 AT gmx DOT de> 	 <20100401163707 DOT GH18364 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> 	 <op DOT vahuhzuy1e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de> 	 <op DOT vahutn051e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:55:07 -0400
Received: by 10.213.49.144 with SMTP id v16mr3985607ebf.46.1270554907787; Tue,  	06 Apr 2010 04:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <u2g2bf229d31004060455ice0daf35m2538a9dbc3dd2c73@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: scp no longer reports incremental progress
From: Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2 April 2010 10:06, Matthias Andree wrote:
> So let's get the network out of the picture. I also observe:
>
> 20100328, no processes running, ash -c "rebaseall -v" starts logging dll
> names after < 1 s.
>
> 20100331, same situation, ash -c "rebaseall -v" shows no output. Note I'm
> not waiting very long, if the system has become an order of magnitude slower
> or goof up flushing console output that would also count as regression.
>
> I've run experiments in mintty as well as cmd.exe windows.

Erm....  Not sure I follow here, was this supposed to be in response
to the scp issue or a new topic?  Why would you rebase for the scp
issue?

Chris

-- 
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple